NBA/NHL Finals Podcast

NHL Playoffs: Yes, This League Still Has Problems Edition

Hey again. I'd like to welcome myself back from a near month long, Simmons-like hiatus from writing. Sorry to all, got mixed up with the whole finals/summer is finally here thing. Mark wrote enough for 4 people anyway so glad to see the ship isn't sinking. Anyways..

If you’re not an NHL fan, well that’s not surprising. The NHL has been in the backseat of the car that the NFL has been driving for a while now. The NBA and MLB seem to take turns in the front depending on who calls shotgun fastest, while the MLS is stuffed in the trunk. As for tennis and golf, well they seem to be drug along something like this.

As an NHL fan myself, I cheer not only for the Blues but the league to do well. I wanna see game highlights on espn and amazing goals in the top 10. I want the league to generate revenue, expand, gain interest and become basically what the NFL is now.

Will the Real NBA MVP Please Stand Up?

The 2011 NBA Finals are set. Dirk's back might need multiple major surgeries after carrying his Mavericks to the franchise's second NBA Final. The most hated team in the league keeps chugging along like the well-oiled machine it was intended to be. And the post-season has magnified several questions I had about the MVP voting when the results came out.
I better give you a warning before I go much further, but I'm about to delve into some controversial stuff. If you know a lot about the NBA, you might not agree with me. The MVP was given to the wrong guy. Now, bare with me here. Forget about the preseason drama and the formation of the Galactic Empire in South Beach. Forget about any biases you might have towards one player or another, favorable or unfavorable. It would seem difficult but since I don't cheer for an NBA team and I just recently got re-interested in the game, I think I am the perfect candidate to unleash an unbiased account of how the MVP Award went down.

First, let me preface the discussion by eliminating a player many thought to be a contender but I believed did not have nearly the same kind of season as the other candidates. That player is Kobe Bryant. Though the Lakers had a successful season and Bryant is obviously a majority factor of that success, I don't believe that Kobe was consistent enough throughout the season to be considered an MVP candidate.


Therefore, I believe the race should have been narrowed to five individual who all were very successful and significantly contributed to teams with a winning record and a Top-4 spot in their respective conferences. Those players are Derrick Rose, LeBron James, Dirk Nowitzki, Dwight Howard, and Kevin Durant. For a quick comparison of some superficial and not-so-superficial statistics for the previously mentioned players, see the chart below.

The chart gives us an idea of how well the MVP candidates stacked up next to each other. The colors indicate where they finished in that given statistical category in comparison to the other four players being considered. Ties were not dropped to the next place, hence, for example, in blocks, there are three 3rd place finishers, all tied with 0.6 blocks per game.

Let me first explain some of the last few columns. PER is a player efficiency rating created by John Holliger of ESPN.com that incorporates most normal statistics into a massive formula that assesses how valuable and efficient a player is. It not only tracks points but field goal percentage, free throw percentage, and defensive statisitics. Furthermore, it subtracts for things like turnovers, missed shots, and personal fouls. Its not a perfect statistic by any means, but its something to think about in analyzing these players. With this in mind, the second column of PER numbers is the average of the given player's top 10 teammates (teammates with the 10 highest PER values which played at least 41 games). Basically, a stat that states how good their teammates were.

There are several things we can take away from this chart. One of which is the only player in the top three in all categories is James. The only category he was lower than second in was blocks. The player with the top PER is also James. And speaking of PER, the teammate PER analysis brings about some intriguing results. While Lebron still had the best individual teammate in Dwyane Wade, his team still had the second-lowest average PER. Rose and Durant both had pretty solid supporting casts throughout their season, although it would be fair to acknowledge that there were times when injuries had decimated the Bulls and Rose was playing with either Joakim Noah or Carlos Boozer (or on the rare occasion, both).

Also interesting to note is that Dwight Howard had the most statistical first place finishes within the chart. His defensive prowess cannot be ignored and it shows through his lead in blocks and rebounds. Possibly the most telling statistic in the case for Howard is the miserable average PER for his team (12.66). The Magic have been known, as a whole, as laughable on the defensive side of the ball. However, Dwight actually single-handily makes them respectable in many team oriented statistical categories. The Magic would have been no where near the 4-seed in the East without the massive contributions of Dwight.

But let's get past the statistics for a bit and comment on what one could see just by watching these guys play every night.

Derrick Rose is obviously a athletic freak with movements so violent and astonishing that he might be considered a once-in-a-lifetime talent. We should all consider ourselves lucky we get to watch this guy for probably the next 14-15 years. He would, at times, carrying the Bulls and will them to victory by himself late in games. He did lead a team that was an 8-seed to become the team with the best record in the league. And this is why he was voted by the press (almost unanimously) as the MVP. However, I don't really agree with that assessment. Rose was great this year. And there were times when he was playing almost by himself due to injury. And there's no question that the Bulls would probably be no where without him, but he wasn't doing it completely alone. Carlos Boozer and Joakim Noah were both every good players this year and Luol Deng is certainly no slouch. And while he got 113 of the possible 120 first place votes, he wouldn't get mine.

Dirk Nowitzki reflects a type of player we may never again see in this league. The mobility and incredible shooting touch of this 7-footer is fun to watch and continues to become history as the Mavs march through the playoffs. The oldest team in the league, the Mavs are full of experienced players who have been around the block a time or two and who know how to handle a NBA regular season. But Dirk doesn't really have that second scorer on his team. He is the person every scouting report is keying on night in and night out and he still delivers the goods every time. He's an efficient scorer without hogging the ball. He gets to the free throw line and makes them at around a 90% clip consistently. He knows his game, where his spots on the floor are, how his teammates work, and is always looking for ways to win at the end of a game. However, he didn't quite have the statistical resume as some of the other candidates and while stats aren't the only thing to consider, they still matter. Leading this "too" veteran team to 57 wins was very impressive, but considering a large portion of this roster has been there before, it is hard to consider Dirk the most valuable player.

When first glancing at Kevin Durant, one wouldn't imagine him being all that good, let alone a deadly shooter. That gangly 6' 9" frame doesn't seem too threatening but you better not give KD space or he will make you pay. His ability to score points in a hurry is certainly a quality that is envied by teams across the league. He was the face of the young gun OKC Thunder. Only his fourth season in the league and he was taking a team full of 25-and-unders to near the top of the Western Conference. While his supporting cast may have been quite young, according to PER, they were the all-around best group of players out of the five teams discussed. I think its fair to say that Durant is incredibly valuable to the Thunder franchise, but I also think there is a lot of young talent that blossoms around the former Longhorn. It is for this reason that I don't believe him to be the MVP of the 2010-2011 season.

The final two candidates I would say are probably equally important to their teams, but since one had overall better statistics and their team ended up being more successful, I would say he is more deserving. The Magic are, as a team, pretty atrocious defensively. However, Dwight Howard's presence actually makes them rank decently in several defensive categories. Without Howard, the court wouldn't open up for all those poor defenders to shoot their open three-pointers either. Some of this is displayed in the extremely sad average PER for Dwight's teammates at 12.66. And Dwight was also the most effective scorer due to his ability to get to the free throw line and his overall lack of missed shots. But some of this can be contributed to the fact that Howard doesn't attempt too many shots from outside about 7 feet. And the Magic did end up being 4th place in the East, and losing in the first round of the playoffs. So the luster on some of Howard's numbers have been recently tarnished.

And it is for this reason (a little hindsight) the statistics, and the overall effect that he has on his team mates and every game he plays in that I believe LeBron James was the 2010-2011 NBA MVP. The Heat are a completely different team this year with the addition of James and Chris Bosh. While people might want to contribute the rise in wins to the fact that the Heat have a "Big Three", think of 40% of the people that are on the court. Along side Wade, James, and Bosh was usually the corpse of Mike Bibby, the hapless Carlos Arroyo, mediocre Mario Chalmers, or the sluggish Zydrunas Ilgauskas. And this team still won 58 games. While Wade had the highest PER of any teammate of the above mentioned players, the top 10 players on the Heat besides James still averaged a lower PER than any other team. James has dominated in every statistical category this season. He scored, he set up his teammates, he rebounded, he played great defense (1st Team All-Defense this year), and he drastically changed the landscape of the Heat's dynamic. Yes, he had one of the top 6 players in the league accompanying him throughout the season, but then explain to me how James still nearly equalled Rose's assist average playing forward or how he out-rebounded all the candidates except the center, Howard. James was efficient with the ball in his hands going for 51% from the field, 76% from the line, and a very respectable 1.95 assist-to-turnover ratio.

While I understand the case for Rose, I can't understand why he received 113 out of the 120 first-place votes. There is no reason the difference should have been that drastic. LeBron had an incredible season, led his team to a very good second-half record, and now has them sitting in the Finals. Obviously, the playoffs have no bearing on any of the regular-season awards, but I think it just goes to show how obviously valuable James is. Last year, the team was losing in the first round to the Celtics 4-1. Now they sit at the precipice of winning a title after winning three straight series 4-1, two of which were against very good teams. I think, looking at the voting, it is fairly obvious that not only do basketball fans resent LeBron for what he did, but so do the voters. And I don't think that should factor into the equation. While they didn't plan it like LeBron and Dwyane apparently did, Jordan was always playing along side Scottie Pippen in each of his MVP seasons. Pippen has been labeled by many around the game as one of the best defenders of all time and he was a more than capable scorer. Why was there outcry against Jordan's candidacy? I don't think LeBron is as good as MJ but I think the two situations are pretty similar.


LeBron may have been wrong for how he went about his "decision" but that doesn't take away from his transcendence amongst the other players in the league. I know he may have been crowned a king way too early, I know he's been given the MJ comparisons way too often, and I know he's playing along side one of the league's best, but I'm sorry. James was not only the best player, he was also the most valuable.

Beware of the Brew Crew

Tell me if you've heard this before:

"The Reds are going to win the National League Central."
"The Reds have great young pitching. All of their starting pitchers are quality."
"The Reds have the best lineup in the league. Every position in their order can hit for power and there is speed everywhere."
"The Reds blah, blah, blah, they're better than the Cardinals and any other team in the Central and will walk away with the division."


After the first almost two months of the 2011 baseball season, I think a few comments are safe to make about the above statements I either read or heard during the off season. One, the Cardinals aren't going anywhere anytime soon. They have compiled a 30-21 record (as of May 26th) without their ace pitcher and with the most consistent hitter in the game going through a strange slump which includes him batting about 68 points below his career average and grounding into more double plays than the fat guy in that old school little league baseball game on the original Nintendo. Two, the Central division is, once again, relatively weak contray to those who thought the Pirates would be solid contenders. They just don't have the pitching yet. Combined them with the completely unwatchable Astros and the hapless Cubbies and the lower tier of the division rivals the NFC West in disgrace to the sport factor. Three, this division isn't going to be a two horse race. I've said it since they acquired two good pitchers in the off season and I'll say it again: the Brewers are going to be at or near the top of the division come September and the Cardinals and Reds better be on high alert.

That's right Cardinals fans (and I guess Reds fans, though I don't think any Reds fans have been reading this), you better beware of the Brewers. They have won 6 games in a row, taken 2nd place from the struggling Reds, and have a healthy starting rotation. I've been telling my fellow co-writer/editor that the Brewers were going to be a factor in this race even before the season started because of the additions of Greinke and Marcum, both of whom were moving from the AL into arguably baseball's weakest division. And while Greinke really only has one year of stellar pitching on his resume, I don't think many people doubt he has the goods to be a highly successful major league pitcher. Shaun Marcum, who was stuck in the pitcher's worst friend, the AL East, for the first part of his career, finds himself in an extremely favorable situation as reflected by his current stat line: 2.37 ERA, 1.02 WHIP, 6-1 record, and a 4.13 K/BB ratio. Meanwhile, the assumed ace of the staff going into the season, Yovani Gallardo, is finally finding his groove after a rough start, posting a 4-0 record with 29 Ks, 1.66 ERA, and 1.00 WHIP in his last four starts. The front three of that rotation would eat up any lineup during a three-game series.


The biggest threat right now to the Brewers being a serious competitor come September might be their inability to win on the road. With a 8-17 road record in the first two months of the season, doubters could certainly point to this stat and say with confidence Milwaukee won't be there when all the chips are on the table. However, I think they have the pitching and the offense to compete with the Reds and the Cardinals, regardless of their atrocious start away from Miller Park. Defense could be one of their major concerns but its currenlt hard to fault a team on defense when the Cardinals look like an 6th grade little league team every other game in the field and are still 9 games above .500.


The major reason I believe in the Brewers ability to compete for the season's entirety is because they have two established stars in Ryan Braun and Prince Fielder (one of whom is playing for a contract), solid 2nd-tier contributors in Rickie Weeks, Casey McGehee, and Corey Hart, an above average front-end of their rotation (as discussed earlier), and a respectable (though not perfect) closer in John Axford. These are all the components contenders USUALLY have and utilize to make a run at a divisional title.

Now, obviously, the Cardinals and Reds might have something to say about it. I merely wanted to point out that this is no longer a Cold War of two superpowers (a la the USA and the USSR). The NL Central has become a three-headed hydra headed for possible self-destruction. Head-to-head games will play a key part in the deciding of the divisional champion. And as we saw last year, the ability to destroy the weaker teams in the division may be the most important part to the championship equation of all. And though I honestly can say I know somewhere in between very little to nothing about Brewer's manager Ron Roenicke, I can safely say I trust him over Dusty Baker. And this is where Cardinals fans may find the most hope. The massive strategical advantage they have in the dugout with Tony LaRussa at the helm.

If the race comes down to the last few weeks, the managerial advantage will become most evident. If this is the case, barring any major injuries, I foresee the Cardinals winning the division. However, there are still a lot of games to be played between now and then. I just wanted to give a heads up to Reds and Cardinals fans alike.

Watch out for those beer-loving Wisconsonites and their hops happy franchise, because Miller isn't the only thing that's brewing in Miller Park these days. A divisional race is as well.

The NFL's Quarterback Future: Part 3

As I stated earlier, the third part of our look at the QB Draft Classes of 2010 and 2011 will be composed of a ranking according to who I think will have the best CAREER as an NFL Quarterback. Besides the obvious component of talent, I'm considering the situation they find themselves in with their current team because that can often dictate the beginning of a quarterback's career, which in turn can significantly effect the overall path of the player's journey.

Keep in mind that there has really only been a small sample size of experience for the 2010 Draft Class and zero experience for the 2011 Class. Also factor in the 2011 Class could be significantly impacted by the lockout and the influence it has on them could effect the rest of their careers.

1. Sam Bradford (Rams, 2010) - Bradford immediately vindicated himself and the hype surrounding him by taking a 1-15 team to 7-9 with little help from a battered, scrappy receiving core. His accuracy is unreal for someone as young as he is, he is generally a great decision maker, and has the perfect balance between feeling the pocket and being able to throw on the run. People are talking up the possibility of a Hall of Fame career and, for once, I'm not doubting them anymore.

2. Jake Locker (Titans, 2011) - I'm going out on a limb here but I think that Locker has inherited a pretty favorable situation in which to start his career, get used to the speed and size of the NFL and take that knowledge and use it to become a very good starting quarterback. While some question his accuracy, his college numbers may have been effected by the multiple injuries he sustained trying to single-handedly carry a pretty weak Washington squad. If Chris Johnson sticks around, the Titans defense is its usual solid self, and the new coaching regime can tutor Locker, I think he becomes a very good NFL quarterback.

3. Blaine Gabbert (Jaguars, 2011) - I originally doubted Gabbert's ability to be a successful passer in an NFL scheme but I am beginning to be convinced that he has the talent and the mental abilities to become a good, if not great, NFL QB. His size is extremely favorable. His arm is cannon-like. And he knows how to win games (like '06 Homecoming versus the hated Parkway Central Colts). I foresee Gabbert waiting a few years to start, unless the coaching staff believes in trail-by-fire and David Gerrard begins to play really poorly. If he gets to learn the NFL game and doesn't have to see continual action right away, it could be a huge advantage in the long run.

4. Ryan Mallett (Patriots, 2011) - Even though I hate them, I have to give respect to the Patriots. They are a well-run franchise that knows how to draft players, develop them properly, and make the most of what they are given. This, along with Mallett's size and arm strength, are the reason I have put him so high on this list. Obviously, he's going to have to wait his turn to start, as HOFer Tom Brady begins to wind down his career. But, once again, this could be incredibly advantageous. With the tutelage of Tom Brady, the genius of Belichick, and the solid Pats D, Mallett could find himself in an enviable situation when he is finally given the reigns of this team.

5. Cam Newton (Panthers, 2011) - Personally, I don't have much faith in the kind of college quarterback Cam Newton was transferring to extreme success in the NFL. While he is a freak athlete, that doesn't always make you a great quarterback. He's no Micheal Vick with his speed and he's no Josh Freeman with his arm. Plus, the Panthers have a lot of question marks on their roster and their offense was pretty atrocious last year. The situation isn't the best for the former Heisman winner and I don't see his style of play keeping him in the league too long either. Yet, the two classes are so weak overall that I could still see him being the 5th most successful. Yikes.

6. Andy Dalton (Bengals, 2011) - I wavered back and forth with Dalton. I wasn't sure if he had enough arm strength to be an NFL quarterback. But I think he will get some time on the bench to hone his skills before he truly has to step up and bring it. He is a very intelligent quarterback with enough mobility to avoid the quick NFL pass rush. Though the Bengals might have some receiving problems soon which might not bode well for a young quarterback. Since it seems Palmer is staying put for now, Dalton may have time to learn enough to be successful when he actually sees the field.

7. Colt McCoy (Browns, 2010) - Colt got 1st year experience behind center and had a few bright spots for a Cleveland team that some people think might be turning a corner. Handing off to Peyton Hillis is going to help out McCoy by taking pressure of him to make throws on first down. I see McCoy possibly becoming the next Drew Brees. Undersized and no one really thinking he can make it in the NFL but going out there and doing it anyway. The reason I have him 7th is because he plays for a cursed franchise. Or, to be more accurate, a cursed city.

8. Christian Ponder (Vikings, 2011) - I see Ponder as very similar to Locker. Good athletes with questionable accuracy who can both hand off to good running backs. However, the Vikings roster is on its way to having a lot of gaping holes which will not aid the development of a young quarterback. Also, it is almost certain that whenever this season gets underway, Ponder will be under center. Unless the Vikes protect their first round pick by starting Patrick Ramsey, Joe Webb, or Tavaris Jackson for a while. But the fans can probably only take so much of the misery of watching any of those three. When Ponder does start, he has two solid backs in the back field in Petersen and Gerhart, which may help in becoming comfortable on an NFL field.

9. Tim Tebow (Broncos, 2010) - While his future is still completely up in the air and no one knows who's going to be start for the Broncos when we have football again, I think Tebow will still find a decent amount of success in the NFL, whether it be as a gadget player or a full-time quarterback. While his arm and release get questioned delay, he still finds ways to be successful. In the three games he starting in 2010, his accuracy was pretty bad, but it was his first year. Not everyone can be Sam Bradford. The first year experience he gained will help him in the future whether it be with the Broncos or another franchise.

10. Colin Kaepernick (49ers, 2011) - I make this pick solely because I believe that if Kaepernick doesn't make it as a quarterback, he could become the next Brad Smith in the NFL. While that requires finding the right team who appreciates his skill set, it may not be his final destiny. There are a lot of weapons to be utilized on the 49ers offense and if he can wrestle the job away from the mediocre group of quarterbacks on their roster, he might become quite successful. Honestly, he might be the most capable of having immediate success in the league (out of the 2011 Class) because of the strong players at skill positions for San Fran and the weakiocre (yes, a mix of the words weak and mediocre) NFC West.

The Rules of Fandom

John and I discuss the rules of fandom, mention a Blues drought, touch on the Duke-North Carolina rivalry, and much more.

The NFL's Quarterback Future: Part 2

Quarterback Class of 2011 (a lot more speculation on my part will be taking place in this post... you have been warned)

Cam Newton (1st overall, Carolina) - First pick of the draft, and finally legally getting paid, Cam Newton has basically unlimited amounts of athleticism and intangibles. Sure, his size will make him harder to bring down, but these aren't some sophomores from Mississippi State trying to take you down, this is Troy Polamalu, Ray Lewis, and Patrick Willis beating the ever living crap out of you and physically attempting to rip off your head. So I don't buy into the whole, "Newton's size will be a huge advantage" train of thought. He didn't learn a complex system in college so we have no idea if he'll be able to do that. He has a strong arm, but it wasn't too impressive at the combine. He has a lot of baggage. Call me stupid, but this looks a lot more like Akili Smith than it does Donovan McNabb. Not really a big believer or fan of Cam Newton.

Jake Locker (8th overall, Tennessee) - I am, however, a fan of Jake Locker. I'm not saying he's going to be really good, but I think he could be a solid NFL quarterback. With the train wreck that is Vince Young beginning to be cleared off the tracks in Nashville, the Titans needed someone to help them look towards the future. Locker is known for his toughness and surprising athleticism. He has running capabilities but needs to work on his accuracy and consistency when throwing the football. A best case scenario for him is if he gets eased into the system, becomes best friends with any play that involves him tossing the ball on outside runs to Chris Johnson, and doesn't have to start right away (enter our favorite player RUSTY SMITH!!!!!!!!!!). Locker could be solid. I would suggest keeping him on your radar for a while because the development might be more gradual here than with say Matt Ryan or Ben Roethlisberger.

Blaine Gabbert (10th overall, Jacksonville) - Is it weird that I am now writing a blog post involving a kid I went to high school and (with the help of two others) led a student section in chanting his name while referencing Inspector Gadget during football games? Geez, life is surreal sometimes. Anyways, Gabbert has great NFL size, good speed for evading pocket pressure, and a very strong arm. People question his abilities because he played in a system where snapping from under center outside of the red zone was as common as Pirates playoff appearances. I may qualify as one of those people. I think Gabbert could be a good NFL quarterback. But I hesitate to say he could be a great NFL quarterback. Luckily, my opinion on the matter means nothing so if he really knows the game as well as the articles I've read suggest, he could become a very successful player in the league. Hopefully, Jacksonville finds the perfect medium between preparing Gabbert while not forcing Gerrard out too quickly. Jaguar fans might, however, prematurely call for Gabbert to start taking the reigns of the offense. And while he is the Jaguars future, it may be best to let him learn everything he can about the offense and watch Gerrard play for a while. Gerrard is a veteran quarterback with some playoff experience and might be able, if he is a true team player, to become a good mentor for rookie. This might optimize Blaine's success.

Christian Ponder (12th overall, Minnesota) - My mouth dropped in shock when I saw this draft pick as I was watching the draft on TV. Minnesota is probably the team I know the second most about because of my time spent in the North Star State so I knew they needed a quarterback like Walken needed more cowbell. But Ponder? At 12th overall? Since I scoured tons and tons of mock drafts and projections (3) and spent hours researching the draft (.25) I was shocked he had gone so high. I had seen him in college. Solid quarterback, seemed to know what he was doing, seemed like a gamer. But the Vikings really pulled one over on me (and their fan base, as comment boards erupting across the Land of 10,000 Lakes). I'm hesitant to really say anything either way on Ponder because I think he could be pretty good but he could also fail. It will help that he's handing off to Adrian Peterson but he also needs some targets to throw to. The Gopher State is filled with worry over this pick, though some people I know are also hopeful. (Notice: For some reason, there are 3 officially recognized nicknames of Minnesota and I used them all. The question is how the heck did they end up with 3? They couldn't just pick one? Kind of tacky if you ask me.)

Andy Dalton (35th overall, Cincinnati) - Perennial winner at TCU and very intelligent quarterback, Andy Dalton gets thrown into the circus that is the Bengals franchise. I think Cincy is going to use Dalton as the heir to the throne that was so unhappily occupied by Carson Palmer. (Though, with Owens and Ochocinco, this offense might have drawn any veteran quarterback nuts. I mean, The T.Ocho Show? Really guys? The epitome of class for sure.) Dalton is fully capable of running an offense as he showed at TCU, but it definitely didn't qualify as pro-style, which may fuel the fire for his many critics. I think, if correctly given gradual responsibility, Dalton could become a solid NFL quarterback along the lines of Ponder and Locker. I don't really think he'll ever succeed at the same level he did at TCU but I think his future could be an interesting one to watch unfold.

Colin Kaepernick (36th overall, San Francisco) - I saw this kid play a few times in college and his athleticism is intriguing. I'm not sold on his arm even though he had several records for total yards from a quarterback over his illustrious career at Nevada. I'm not quite sure if San Fran thinks he is a long term solution at quarterback because their whole situation is really puzzling to outsiders right now. Are they going to go forward with Alex Smith? Troy Smith? Kaepernick is already 23 so if he can display wisdom equivalent to his years, he might gain access to the weapons of the 49ers offense. Its unfortunate they have so much uncertainty at the position because I would personally love throwing to Michael Crabtree, Ted Ginn, and Vernon Davis while handing it off to Frank Gore. Add Kaepernick's running abilities into the fold and that offense could cause a lot of misdirection and wreak havoc on unsuspecting NFC West defenses.

Ryan Mallett (74th overall, New England) - Did the Patriots do it again? Steal a franchise changer late in the draft? We'll probably have to wait longer than we did with Tom Brady because he isn't giving up the reigns on his dying dynasty just yet. However, a lot of NFL pundits are on the Mallett bandwagon, which includes a cannon arm, massive frame, and plenty of recreational drug use. While he may be, "smokin' dubbies with his brothers," (a la Michael Scott) he could still prove to be a very capable NFL quarterback. I'm sure he's thrilled to be working under Wild Bill and Tom Brady. If he's patient, learns the system, listens to everything Brady has to say about football (along with hints on getting a model to marry you), and develops his talents, he could go down as the steal of the draft and become a great NFL quarterback. But there are a lot of variables in this equation that are yet to be determined, so we'll have to wait and see.

Ricky Stanzi (135th overall, Kansas City) - I've seen a lot of Stanzi games. He was often extremely agitating to watch for Hawkeye fans but he did find a way to win games. And though he lacked touchdowns in 2010, he was one of the most efficient passers in the country. Obviously, KC is looking for a backup as Matt Cassel seems to have a strong hold on the starting job for the foreseeable future. I think this is a good role for Stanzi to take, especially since the competition is quite thin (Brodie Croyle and Tyler Palko(?)). If he can gain some confidence, learn the playbook, and do the little things, he will be prepared for success if injuries should befall Cassel. I think Stanzi could be a sufficient NFL backup for just about any franchise.

T.J. Yates (152nd overall, Houston) - I've seen Yates play before but I don't know too much about his specific abilities. I feel like his name screams old southern money or is that just me? Looking up his place of birth confirms this (Marietta, Georgia) suspicion. He holds multiple passing records at North Carolina but does that really say much about him? I can't name another quarterback from North Carolina. Anyways, from what I remember he's a decent athlete with some mobility. His arm is solid and he has good size for a quarterback. Most of his skills scream NFL mediocrity to me though. Drafted in a situation similar to Stanzi's, the Texans are just looking for a backup for Matt "I rack up a lot of passing yards but I'm not all that impressive because I get to throw to Andre Johnson" Schaub. I don't foresee Yates being a long term NFL starter.

Nathan Enderle (160th overall, Chicago) - I've seen a few plays of Idaho-run offense with Enderle under center (thank you Boise for making me watch a few WAC games). He threw for over 3,000 yards last year but again, that was in a weak WAC conference. Chicago is looking for backup solutions, though since Jay Cutler is a wuss, a backup in Chicago might be much more likely to play then say a backup in Indianapolis. I foresee a future where we are talking about Nathan Enderle and saying, "How the heck did this guy from Idaho drafted 160th overall get 5 starts his rookie season?!?!" I mean when the other backups on your roster are guys from Idaho State (Matt Gutierrez, they can be potato buddies!!!!!) and Colorado State (Caleb Haine, who somehow saw action in the NFC Championship. Seriously you cannot make this stuff up.), and a 17 year NFL veteran (a Todd Collins who may bare a slight resemblance to the Crypt Keeper) you actually might have a chance to win the backup job. Have we ever seen a team with three backups who are from the Mountain West, WAC, and Big Sky (a I-AA conference in football)? For a team who's quarterback goes down with a broken nail, they certainly don't have much security on the bench do they?

Tyrod Taylor (180th overall, Baltimore) - This is one of the most interesting draft contrasts I've seen in recent years. Taylor is an explosive athlete and not your average run-of-the-mill conservative pocket passer that the Ravens have employed in recent years. Baltimore has been a run-first team for a long time. And that won't change anytime soon with Harbaugh at the helm. So Taylor finds himself in an interesting situation. Maybe the Ravens will utilize him in a Brad Smith type role and open their playbook for the first time since the franchise moved to Baltimore? Who knows but personally I'm very interested to see what happens. I think Taylor could be solid in the NFL if used correctly. He has a lot of experience and has shown a lot of football intelligence. Personally, I'm looking forward to watching this situation develop.

Greg McElroy (208th overall, New York Jets) -Probably one of the smartest quarterbacks to come out of the draft in the long time, McElroy has proven himself a winner with a BCS Championship to his name. He knows how to lead an offense by avoiding big mistakes and properly utilizing the talent around him to his advantage. While you might say it was easy for him to win with the likes of Ingram and Richardson in the backfield, he played in college football's best conference with a lot of poise and success. I think he's similar to the quarterback he'll be backing up, Mark Sanchez. No cannon arm, but decent mobility and a bit of grit about him that might make him a valuable backup. He got drafted into the perfect franchise for his abilities and type of play.

Though we don't have any kind of sample size of professional experience for this draft class, I think it might be a bit deeper than 2010's. I think Newton, Ponder, Dalton, Gabbert, and Locker could all have some success in the NFL as starters. Whereas last year's class might have the best quarterback out of the two in Bradford, it struggled to produce multiple long-term starting options for NFL teams. We'll get more specific in Part 3.

The NFL's Quarterback Future: Part 1

**Warning: This post is long. As in the Great Wall of China IS long or Jason Kidd IS old or Blake Lively IS attractive or Elijah Dukes IS a thug.**

Due to the evolution of the sport and the NFL itself, the most important position on a roster to fill, with no question in anyone's mind who has any remote knowledge of the sport, is the quarterback. By my count, in the last 15 years, only twice (and both times the teams' defenses were other-worldly) has a quarterback of mediocre skill level held Lombardi's trophy: Trent Dilfer with the Ravens in 2001 and Brad Johnson with the Buccaneers in 2003. Quarterbacks get paid ridiculous amounts of money to sling the ball down the field in complex offensive systems to ensure a machine-esque offense to attempt to conquer their respective division and attempt a run at the Super Bowl. To further emphasize the importance of the quarterback, blind side tackles are getting paid incredibly lucrative sums to protect the most important asset of the team from concussions and other injuries.

The NFL is, without a doubt, a quarterback's world. Who says they're going to Disney World when they win the Super Bowl? No, its not Darren Sharper on the Saints, its Drew Brees. You think Greg Jennings had a date with Minnie Mouse? Wrong sir. Aaron Rodgers was obviously the one headed to Walt's world of wonderment.

Now that we've established the painfully obvious, (Right now you are either nodding your head up and down or have just decided to leave the page before finishing reading this post because you are sick of reading things you already know.) let us delve into the slightly less known area of quarterbacks of the future. And by future I mean let's look at the quarterbacks drafted in the last two drafts (2010 and 2011) and figure what they heck they are capable of in the league. Half of these players have already seen action in mini-camps, preseason games, and, for a lucky few, actual NFL games. Some haven't even really talked to their coaches legally. Trust me, they've talked to their coaches but the legality of such an event is questionable due to the lockout.

All Time Favorite Obscure Cardinals Players

Watching Pete Kozma hit an RBI double in his first major league at-bat got me thinking. Really, it was his name. It was like a hybrid of Cosmo Kramer's two names: Kozma. And then it got me think of those guys who get a few at-bats in the majors and disappear. This is not to say that Pete will suffer a similar fate to Archibald Wright "Moonlight" Graham. It just made me think of Hector Luna and Luther Hackman. Those Cardinals that weren't really that good but who stuck with you or just make you chuckle when you hear their name (for example, Estaban Yan). So, in honor of that though, I bring you my ten favorite obscure Cardinals. They must have had no particularly great success and not played more than three seasons with the team. Also, my comprehension of baseball stated in 1996 so they had to play sometime after that. Besides that, making this list was quite easy as you will see.

In no particular order:

Jason Simontacchi (2002-2004) - He was actually pretty solid for us for a few years as a back-up starter and sometimes bullpen pitcher. Basically made the list because of his last name and his memorable socks.

Einar Diaz (2005) - A classic scrappy backup catcher of the Tony LaRussa Era. Nothing too classic about his except the fact that he was used in emergency situations in many a MLB Showdown game.

Gene Stechschulte (2000-2002) - A relief pitcher with an awesome last name. The reason he made the list is I remember watching him hit a home run in a rare plate appearance which also happened to be his first career major league at-bat.

Keith McDonald (2000-2001) - A catcher who I think ended up playing in like 10 or 15 games for the Cardinals. He also homered in his first career at-bat as a pinch hitter in a game. Then, homered in his second career at-bat, a feat I think is more rare than the unassisted triple play. It was all the more memorable because I was at the game he hit the second home run.

Shawon Dunston (1999-2000) - Actually a pretty decent player, he was a part of one of the most vivid Cardinal memories I have: the Moth Game of June 22nd, 2000. With Busch Stadium being swarmed by moths due to something in the field's grass, Dunston hit two late-inning home runs, the last of which bounced off Barry Bond's glove in left field to pace the Cardinals to a come-from-behind victory.

Chuck Finley (2002) - For some reason, I've always had a strong affinity towards Chuck Finley and was absolutely tickled when we got him near the trade deadline to aide us in a divisional race. I always remember that he is one of the few pitchers to have ever thrown 4 strikeouts in 2 different innings in his career.

Rick Honeycutt (1996-1997) - One, his name is really cool (and yes, that is really important when it comes to making this list). Two, he was a vital part of my unbelievable season in Ken Griffey Junior's Baseball 1997 for GameBoy. I played all 162 games and went something like 120-42. And Honeycutt had a nasty breaking pitch.

Ray King (2004-2005) - Mostly for the physical comedy that accompanied every time Ray trotting from the bullpen to the pitcher's mound. And that his nickname was Burger. And that I saw countless signs at Busch in a short two year span that referenced said nickname. Good times.

Heatcliff Slocumb (1999-2000) - Well, I think you can guess why he made the list. That's right, awesome name. Really, besides that I can't remember too much. Except that an old childhood friend of mine would always pretend to be him when we were pretending to play baseball in his basement. But once again, this was probably because his name was fun to say.

Fernando Valenzuela (1997) - The only person on the list to make it because of the just plain strangeness of the circumstances. He was a cardinal for such a short time but its still an interesting trivia question. Who was the last team Valenzuela played for? The St. Louis Cardinals. Let's just say that we didn't quite catch Fernando-mania here in the Midwest.

First John and Mark Podcast

Apologies for some of the random crappy-sounding noises. I'm currently working on making the overall sound quality much better and "listenable". Our next one will be much neater both audio-wise and content-wise. So just don't let the first attempt discourage you from listening to future podcasts.